1973-75 Recession History, Chart, 2009 Comparison?

I provided a S&P chart during the 1973-1975 recession and other information. Wikipedia: From 1973-75 the Dow lost 45% of it's value, real GDP growth slowed to -2.1% and inflation (CPI) jumped from 3.4% in 1972 to 12.3% in 1974 due to oil embargo, USD devaluation etc. With the S&P, oil and other commodities on the rise and US Treasuries being dumped lets hope it is forecasting strong growth with stable prices going forward w/ I guess the Gov picking up the employment tab (2)? Plus is China trying to bring down the price of oil by showing their reserves (WSJ 1, 2). Keep an eye on crude.

S&P 500 1971-1976 (Bigcharts.com)

This is also interesting. Analysts called 1973 wrong (Time Magazine article on January 8, 1973, mentions economist Alan Greenspan).

"Most Wall Street analysts are convinced that the market will continue to climb smartly in 1973. Brokers looking for a marked increase in trading volume see signs that small investors are beginning to overcome fears instilled by the Wall Street slide of 1970 and return to the market. Investment from abroad is also on the rise. Economist Alan Greenspan estimates that foreigners put $1.6 billion into American securities last year and will buy $3 billion worth in 1973."

A Gilt-Edged Year for the Stock Market (TIME - January 8, 1973)

Other news links I found about the 1973-1975 recession:

David Rosenberg: Recession to Be Worst Since 1970s (WSJ Blog)

Recession 1973 vs. 2008 (Jack B. Walters)

The Recession of 1973-75 in the U.S. (applet-magic.com)

1973–1974 stock market crash (Wikipedia)

George Bush Impersonator, Colbert (Correspondents Dinner)

If I had a blog in 2006, this would definitely be on there. At the White House Correspondents Dinner in 2006 George Bush and an impersonator were on stage at the same time. Also Colbert Roasted Bush too. I couldn't embed the C-span videos but they are both available on Google: Bush Impersonator, Colbert Roasts Bush. Bush was funny for doing that.

Posted by newsbysector blog.

G7 Currency Implied Volatility Up Since May

Kind of related to my last post about the Latvian Lat. The currency markets could get volatile again based on the JPM G7 Currency Implied Volatility Index at Bloomberg.com. Fund X has been bidding up volatility since early May. Today the index closed at 15.67 which is up 17% since it hit bottom in early May (13.38). It is interesting that G7 volatility caught a bid right when the US Dollar broke down. Someone is anticipating currency swings but implied volatility isn't even close to the 2008 highs. I'll be watching for premium sellers or G7 currency movement on news going forward. Also euro/dollar implied vol is at an 8 week high. We shall see people.

G7 Currency Volatility Index (Bloomberg.com)

VIX, Currency Options Signal Rally May End: Technical Analysis (Bloomberg)
Forex Options Show US Dollar Sentiment Extreme, Bounce Likely (DailyFX)
Carry Interest Rising, Lack of Risk Doesn't Translate Into Strong Fundamentals (DailyFX)

Obama Speaks in Cairo, Egypt (Full CSPAN Video)

"PRESIDENT OBAMA: Thank you very much. Good afternoon. I am honored to be in the timeless city of Cairo, and to be hosted by two remarkable institutions. For over a thousand years, Al-Azhar has stood as a beacon of Islamic learning; and for over a century, Cairo University has been a source of Egypt's advancement. And together, you represent the harmony between tradition and progress. I'm grateful for your hospitality, and the hospitality of the people of Egypt. And I'm also proud to carry with me the goodwill of the American people, and a greeting of peace from Muslim communities in my country: Assalaamu alaykum. (Applause.)"

Full Transcript at Whitehouse.gov

Economic Blogger Mish Speaks at Google (Video)

Mish (Mike Shedlock) who runs the blog "Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis" spoke at Google. His blog is great for economic analysis.

Latvian Lat Falls, Blondes Rally

A failed Latvian short-term debt auction on Wednesday made the Lat and other Eastern European currencies fall against the Euro and USD. The fear is that Latvia would devalue it's currency to spur exports due to the economic slump (Latvia expects -18% economic growth, budget deficit 8.2% of GDP -FT). This would make it harder for Latvian companies/consumers to service their debt or pay back loans denominated in other currencies (Swedbank -15.9% -FT). Nigel Rendell of RBC Capital had this to say about the country.

"Nigel Rendell, senior emerging markets strategist at RBC Capital Markets, said: “The country is in a mess with the economy expected to contract very sharply this year, while the budget deficit is horribly high. Devaluation looks very likely as a way of boosting exports and growth.” (FT.com)
Last thing we need right now is another interbank lending freeze which could spill into the Euro and US Dollar funding markets and bank CDS (which would ultimately lead to more Gov backstops). Latvia's CDS spread widened while it's Central Bank said it would keep the Lat pegged to the Euro (Bloomberg, Reuters).

USD/Latvia Lat (INO.com)

News Links:
Latvia, Lithuania, SEB CDS rise sharply-CMA (Reuters)
EU Warns Latvia on Budget Deficit Amid Crisis (WSJ)
Latvia auction flop sparks fears of struggle to find debt buyers (FT)
Baltic concerns take their toll of krona (FT)
IMF agreement on budget critical for Latvia-Fitch (Reuters)
Waiting for Latvia to devalue (FTAlphaville)
Make no mistake, the ‘Baltic Three’ are in the dock (FTAlphaville)
Latvia Finds Itself In Currency And Funding Crisis, Kills EM Rally (Zero Hedge)

Forint Falls Most in Three Months on Latvia Devaluation Concern (Bloomberg)

To stay up to date on currency pairs of Eastern Europe vs. USD I embedded live charts below from forexpros.com.

Housing Datathon: Housing Starts, Building Permits, Pending Home Sales

This is part 1 of a DV housing datathon. I'm going to dig into housing and housing related data on my next few posts to show what's going on in the industry and to see if we are at the bottom.

Housing Starts/Building Permits: The total Housing Starts (HOUST) chart is still in a downtrend however you could say the pace is getting less worse. Housing Starts for 1 Unit structures (single family homes) actually increased 2.8% from March. It is brushing up against downtrend resistance so watch out for a break there and possible leadership. The data point that killed HOUST was apartment building starts. Also building Permits hit a new low.

Total Housing Starts (Stlouisfed.org)

Housing Starts (1 Unit) (Stlouisfed.org)

Construction Permits (Stlouisfed.org)

Full Bernanke Testimony Video/Text (House Budget Committee) - 6/3/2009

Chairman Ben Bernanke testified about the state of the U.S economy before the House Budget Committee today (June 3, 2009). Below is the full hearing video via CSPAN and text.

"Chairman Ben S. Bernanke
Current economic and financial conditions and the federal budget
Before the Committee on the Budget, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.
June 3, 2009

Chairman Spratt, Ranking Member Ryan, and other members of the Committee, I am pleased to have this opportunity to offer my views on current economic and financial conditions and on issues pertaining to the federal budget.

Economic Developments and Outlook

The U.S. economy has contracted sharply since last fall, with real gross domestic product (GDP) having dropped at an average annual rate of about 6 percent during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of this year. Among the enormous costs of the downturn is the loss of nearly 6 million jobs since the beginning of 2008. The most recent information on the labor market--the number of new and continuing claims for unemployment insurance through late May--suggests that sizable job losses and further increases in unemployment are likely over the next few months.

However, the recent data also suggest that the pace of economic contraction may be slowing. Notably, consumer spending, which dropped sharply in the second half of last year, has been roughly flat since the turn of the year, and consumer sentiment has improved. In coming months, households' spending power will be boosted by the fiscal stimulus program. Nonetheless, a number of factors are likely to continue to weigh on consumer spending, among them the weak labor market, the declines in equity and housing wealth that households have experienced over the past two years, and still-tight credit conditions.

Activity in the housing market, after a long period of decline, has also shown some signs of bottoming. Sales of existing homes have been fairly stable since late last year, and sales of new homes seem to have flattened out in the past couple of monthly readings, though both remain at depressed levels. Meanwhile, construction of new homes has been sufficiently restrained to allow the backlog of unsold new homes to decline--a precondition for any recovery in homebuilding.

Businesses remain very cautious and continue to reduce their workforces and capital investments. On a more positive note, firms are making progress in shedding the unwanted inventories that they accumulated following last fall's sharp downturn in sales. The Commerce Department estimates that the pace of inventory liquidation quickened in the first quarter, accounting for a sizable portion of the reported decline in real GDP in that period. As inventory stocks move into better alignment with sales, firms should become more willing to increase production.

We continue to expect overall economic activity to bottom out, and then to turn up later this year. Our assessments that consumer spending and housing demand will stabilize and that the pace of inventory liquidation will slow are key building blocks of that forecast. Final demand should also be supported by fiscal and monetary stimulus, and U.S. exports may benefit if recent signs of stabilization in foreign economic activity prove accurate. An important caveat is that our forecast also assumes continuing gradual repair of the financial system and an associated improvement in credit conditions; a relapse in the financial sector would be a significant drag on economic activity and could cause the incipient recovery to stall. I will provide a brief update on financial markets in a moment.

Even after a recovery gets under way, the rate of growth of real economic activity is likely to remain below its longer-run potential for a while, implying that the current slack in resource utilization will increase further. We expect that the recovery will only gradually gain momentum and that economic slack will diminish slowly. In particular, businesses are likely to be cautious about hiring, and the unemployment rate is likely to rise for a time, even after economic growth resumes.

In this environment, we anticipate that inflation will remain low. The slack in resource utilization remains sizable, and, notwithstanding recent increases in the prices of oil and other commodities, cost pressures generally remain subdued. As a consequence, inflation is likely to move down some over the next year relative to its pace in 2008. That said, improving economic conditions and stable inflation expectations should limit further declines in inflation.

Conditions in Financial Markets

Conditions in a number of financial markets have improved since earlier this year, likely reflecting both policy actions taken by the Federal Reserve and other agencies as well as the somewhat better economic outlook. Nevertheless, financial markets and financial institutions remain under stress, and low asset prices and tight credit conditions continue to restrain economic activity.

Among the markets where functioning has improved recently are those for short-term funding, including the interbank lending markets and the commercial paper market. Risk spreads in those markets appear to have moderated, and more lending is taking place at longer maturities. The better performance of short-term funding markets in part reflects the support afforded by Federal Reserve lending programs. It is encouraging that the private sector’s reliance on the Fed’s programs has declined as market stresses have eased, an outcome that was one of our key objectives when we designed our interventions. The issuance of asset-backed securities (ABS) backed by credit card, auto, and student loans has also picked up this spring, and ABS funding rates have declined, developments supported by the availability of the Federal Reserve’s Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility as a market backstop.

In markets for longer-term credit, bond issuance by nonfinancial firms has been relatively strong recently, and spreads between Treasury yields and rates paid by corporate borrowers have narrowed some, though they remain wide. Mortgage rates and spreads have also been reduced by the Federal Reserve's program of purchasing agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities. However, in recent weeks, yields on longer-term Treasury securities and fixed-rate mortgages have risen. These increases appear to reflect concerns about large federal deficits but also other causes, including greater optimism about the economic outlook, a reversal of flight-to-quality flows, and technical factors related to the hedging of mortgage holdings.

As you know, last month, the federal bank regulatory agencies released the results of the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP). The purpose of the exercise was to determine, for each of the 19 U.S.-owned bank holding companies with assets exceeding $100 billion, a capital buffer sufficient for them to remain strongly capitalized and able to lend to creditworthy borrowers even if economic conditions over the next two years turn out to be worse than we currently expect. According to the findings of the SCAP exercise, under the more adverse economic outlook, losses at the 19 bank holding companies would total an estimated $600 billion during 2009 and 2010. After taking account of potential resources to absorb those losses, including expected revenues, reserves, and existing capital cushions, we determined that 10 of the 19 institutions should raise, collectively, additional common equity of $75 billion.

Each of the 10 bank holding companies requiring an additional buffer has committed to raise this capital by November 9. We are in discussions with these firms on their capital plans, which are due by June 8. Even in advance of those plans being approved, the 10 firms have among them already raised more than $36 billion of new common equity, with a number of their offerings of common shares being over-subscribed. In addition, these firms have announced actions that would generate up to an additional $12 billon of common equity. We expect further announcements shortly as their capital plans are finalized and submitted to supervisors. The substantial progress these firms have made in meeting their required capital buffers, and their success in raising private capital, suggests that investors are gaining greater confidence in the banking system.

Fiscal Policy in the Current Economic and Financial Environment

Let me now turn to fiscal matters. As you are well aware, in February of this year, the Congress passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, or ARRA, a major fiscal package aimed at strengthening near-term economic activity. The package included personal tax cuts and increases in transfer payments intended to stimulate household spending, incentives for business investment, increases in federal purchases, and federal grants for state and local governments.

Predicting the effects of these fiscal actions on economic activity is difficult, especially in light of the unusual economic circumstances that we face. For example, households confronted with declining incomes and limited access to credit might be expected to spend most of their tax cuts; then again, heightened economic uncertainties and the desire to increase precautionary saving or pay down debt might reduce households’ propensity to spend. Likewise, it is difficult to judge how quickly funds dedicated to infrastructure needs and other longer-term projects will be spent and how large any follow-on effects will be. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has constructed a range of estimates of the effects of the stimulus package on real GDP and employment that appropriately reflects these uncertainties. According to the CBO's estimates, by the end of 2010, the stimulus package could boost the level of real GDP between about 1 percent and a little more than 3 percent and the level of employment by between roughly 1 million and 3-1/2 million jobs.

The increases in spending and reductions in taxes associated with the fiscal package and the financial stabilization program, along with the losses in revenues and increases in income-support payments associated with the weak economy, will widen the federal budget deficit substantially this year. The Administration recently submitted a proposed budget that projects the federal deficit to reach about $1.8 trillion this fiscal year before declining to $1.3 trillion in 2010 and roughly $900 billion in 2011. As a consequence of this elevated level of borrowing, the ratio of federal debt held by the public to nominal GDP is likely to move up from about 40 percent before the onset of the financial crisis to about 70 percent in 2011. These developments would leave the debt-to-GDP ratio at its highest level since the early 1950s, the years following the massive debt buildup during World War II.

Certainly, our economy and financial markets face extraordinary near-term challenges, and strong and timely actions to respond to those challenges are necessary and appropriate. Nevertheless, even as we take steps to address the recession and threats to financial stability, maintaining the confidence of the financial markets requires that we, as a nation, begin planning now for the restoration of fiscal balance. Prompt attention to questions of fiscal sustainability is particularly critical because of the coming budgetary and economic challenges associated with the retirement of the baby-boom generation and continued increases in medical costs. The recent projections from the Social Security and Medicare trustees show that, in the absence of programmatic changes, Social Security and Medicare outlays will together increase from about 8-1/2 percent of GDP today to 10 percent by 2020 and 12-1/2 percent by 2030. With the ratio of debt to GDP already elevated, we will not be able to continue borrowing indefinitely to meet these demands.

Addressing the country's fiscal problems will require a willingness to make difficult choices. In the end, the fundamental decision that the Congress, the Administration, and the American people must confront is how large a share of the nation's economic resources to devote to federal government programs, including entitlement programs. Crucially, whatever size of government is chosen, tax rates must ultimately be set at a level sufficient to achieve an appropriate balance of spending and revenues in the long run. In particular, over the longer term, achieving fiscal sustainability--defined, for example, as a situation in which the ratios of government debt and interest payments to GDP are stable or declining, and tax rates are not so high as to impede economic growth--requires that spending and budget deficits be well controlled.

Clearly, the Congress and the Administration face formidable near-term challenges that must be addressed. But those near-term challenges must not be allowed to hinder timely consideration of the steps needed to address fiscal imbalances. Unless we demonstrate a strong commitment to fiscal sustainability in the longer term, we will have neither financial stability nor healthy economic growth."

$SLV Back Month Options Active, Implied Volatility Up

Silver has been on fire recently moving inversely with the US Dollar. Tonight the USD is at 78.51 down from 82 a few weeks ago. The USD has support around 78 where it could start to retrace. $SLV is up 30% from the beginning of May. I recently wrote about Paulson & Co's GLD/GDX buys and Hecla Mining option activity.

Back to $SLV's options. Last Friday ONN.tv, (article) reported that 100,000 Jan 2010 $13 puts were sold, 75,000 Jan 2010 $14 calls were bought and 100,000 $19 calls were sold (vertical call spread) on $SLV. If these prints are correct someone is levering up to own 7.5 million shares of $SLV at $14 before Jan 15, 2010 with a $19 cap. Here it is visually.

$SLV Jan '10 Calls (Yahoo Finance)
$SLV Jan '10 Puts (Yahoo Finance)

I also saw interesting action in October today. Over 6,000 contracts traded on both the Oct '09 $17 and $22 calls. Is this an out-of-the money credit or debit spread? The ticks were quite peculiar. Either way calls on this ETF are being played with from $14-22 expiring Oct-Jan. The 75k-100k volume speaks much louder. I provided a charts for the Oct '09 $17 and $22 strike.

$SLV Oct '09 Calls (Yahoo Finance)

$SLVJQ Oct '09 $17 Call (OptionsXpress)

$SLVJV Oct '09 $22 Call (OptionsXpress)

Also check out implied volatility on $SLV. It's been trending higher recently with a big volume spike. Check out this chart from Ivolatility.com. Options are anticipating a move here.

On the chart $SLV recently broke out and is testing a flattish downtrend and overhead resistance (early 2008). RSI is strong at 78 but could get overbought eventually. The 50/200 crossed to the upside which could support a rising trend going forward. Resistance is at $19 and $20 . Silver looks like a good long term story imo. We'll see.

Conan O'Brien First Tonight Show Episode Featuring Will Ferrell

Nothing finance related here. I thought I would put up the first Conan O'Brien Tonight Show episode. Hulu is taking over the world. $SLV options active, developing..

$SPY Testing May 2008 Downtrend, Technical Views From Strategists

SPY and $ES_F (S&P E-Mini June Future) pierced through ceiling resistance and are now about to test the mother downtrend starting at May 2008. A break through of this trend would be very bullish. A break down would be bearish. The GM/Chrysler bankruptcy news is behind us (hopefully runs smoothly) so this summer should get interesting, place your bets. I provided charts of $SPY and $ESM9 (S&P future) via INO.com. Also technical views on the market from CNBC.com videos.

ING Technical Analyst Roelof van den Akker: USD will move higher, Dow will top out at 9,000 and correct to 7,500.

SPY May Put Pessimists Squeezed, Contracts Ripped Up

These charts are interesting from schaeffersresearch.com. Look how the SPY (S&P 500 ETF) put/call open interest ratio declined 24% after the May expiration (1.87-1.42). The market rally and declining volatility squeezed the May pessimists and expired insurance worthless. The SPY put/call ratio is still relatively elevated at 1.59 on June 1 and the put/call volume ratio is still holding it's own.

SPY Put/Call Open Interest Ratio (Schaeffersresearch)

SPY Put/Call Volume Ratio (Schaeffersresearch.com)

SPY Volatility vs. Price (Schaeffersresearch)

D7 Tech Conference Videos, Charts: YHOO, MSFT, NOK, RIMM (Nasdaq)

The Nasdaq and the Qs are in charge at the moment so I thought I'd look at the tech industry. AllThingsD recently had their D7 Conference so I embedded some videos below along with tech stock charts. Large cap tech is making moves and YHOO, MSFT, RIMM and NOK are all above their 200 day moving average. The RSI (relative strength index) is still very strong so they could be chasable for a few more points, but a pullback would look good after a 50%+ run, in my opinion (yo no se). First here is Tech Ticker's take on the conference.

Yahoo's CEO Carol Bartz said she would sell Yahoo if she got a boat load of money and the company had the right technology. She also talks up brand advertising and video ads etc.. When will there be another $33 offer? Yahoo Chart ($YHOO/Stockcharts.com).

Microsoft just came out with a new search engine called Bing. CEO Steve Ballmer introduces Bing and also talks about Netbooks. Microsoft Chart ($MSFT/Stockcharts.com).

Nokia CEO Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo previews the Nokia N97 phone. Nokia Chart ($NOK/Stockcharts.com). It looks like it's options were active today, Nokia (NOK) Sees Spike in Option Trading (Schaeffers Research).

RIMM (Research and Motion) co-CEO Mark Lazardis talks about the next phase in wireless technology, smart phones, the iPhone buzz and the consumer's appetite for advanced communications. Research & Motion Chart ($RIMM/Stockcharts.com).

They also had the Twitter founders and Mark Cuban on stage. Cuban hates on the Internet but likes the TV space.

Geithner's Speech Peking University, Prof Xiao Geng

Here is part of Geithner's speech at Peking University in Beijing, China along with words from Professor Xiao Geng from Tshinghua University and news links below.

"May 31, 2009

The United States and China, Cooperating for Recovery and Growth
Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner
Speech at Peking University - Beijing, China
June 1st, 2009

It is a pleasure to be back in China and to join you here today at this great university.

I first came to China, and to Peking University, in the summer of 1981 as a college student studying Mandarin. I was here with a small group of graduate and undergraduate students from across the United States. I returned the next summer to Beijing Normal University.

We studied reasonably hard, and had the privilege of working with many talented professors, some of whom are here today. As we explored this city and traveled through Eastern China, we had the chance not just to understand more about your history and your aspirations, but also to begin to see the United States through your eyes.

Over the decades since, we have seen the beginnings of one of the most extraordinary economic transformations in history. China is thriving. Economic reform has brought exceptionally rapid and sustained growth in incomes. China¡¯s emergence as a major economic force more fully integrated into the world economy has brought substantial benefits to the United States and to economies around the world.

In recognition of our mutual interest in a positive, cooperative, and comprehensive relationship, President Hu Jintao and President Obama agreed in April to establish the Strategic and Economic Dialogue. Secretary Clinton and I will host Vice Premier Wang and State Councilor Dai in Washington this summer for our first meeting. I have the privilege of beginning the economic discussions with a series of meetings in Beijing today and tomorrow.

These meetings will give us a chance to discuss the risks and challenges on the economic front, to examine some of the longer term challenges we both face in laying the foundation for a more balanced and sustainable recovery, and to explore our common interest in international financial reform.

Current Challenges and Risks

The world economy is going through the most challenging economic and financial stress in generations.

The International Monetary Fund predicts that the world economy will shrink this year for the first time in more than six decades. The collapse of world trade is likely to be the worst since the end of World War II. The lost output, compared to the world economy's potential growth in a normal year, could be between three and four trillion dollars.

In the face of this challenge, China and the United States are working together to help shape a strong global strategy to contain the crisis and to lay the foundation for recovery. And these efforts, the combined effect of forceful policy actions here in China, in the United States, and in other major economies, have helped slow the pace of deterioration in growth, repair the financial system, and improve confidence.

In fact, what distinguishes the current crisis is not just its global scale and its acute severity, but the size and speed of the global response.

At the G-20 Leaders meeting in London in April, we agreed on an unprecedented program of coordinated policy actions to support growth, to stabilize and repair the financial system, to restore the flow of credit essential for trade and investment, to mobilize financial resources for emerging market economies through the international financial institutions, and to keep markets open for trade and investment.

That historic accord on a strategy for recovery was made possible in part by the policy actions already begun in China and the United States.

China moved quickly as the crisis intensified with a very forceful program of investments and financial measures to strengthen domestic demand.

In the United States, in the first weeks of the new Administration, we put in place a comprehensive program of tax incentives and investments ¨C the largest peace time recovery effort since World War II - to help arrest the sharp fall in private demand. Alongside these fiscal measures, we acted to ease the housing crisis. And we have put in place a series of initiatives to bring more capital into the banking system and to restart the credit markets.

These actions have been reinforced by similar actions in countries around the world.

In contrast to the global crisis of the 1930s and to the major economic crises of the postwar period, the leaders of the world acted together. They acted quickly. They took steps to provide assistance to the most vulnerable economies, even as they faced exceptional financial needs at home. They worked to keep their markets open, rather than retreating into self-defeating measures of discrimination and protection.

And they have committed to make sure this program of initiatives is sustained until the foundation for recovery is firmly established, a commitment the IMF will monitor closely, and that we will be able to evaluate together when the G-20 Leaders meet again in the United States this fall.

We are starting to see some initial signs of improvement. The global recession seems to be losing force. In the United States, the pace of decline in economic activity has slowed. Households are saving more, but consumer confidence has improved, and spending is starting to recover. House prices are falling at a slower pace and the inventory of unsold homes has come down significantly. Orders for goods and services are somewhat stronger. The pace of deterioration in the labor market has slowed, and new claims for unemployment insurance have started to come down a bit..." (Full speech at Treasury.gov).

E-Mini June S&P Future Testing MAJOR Levels

GM is going bankrupt and the E-Mini S&P June future, currently trading at 932, is testing ceiling resistance between the Jan high of 938 and May high of 929. It successfully broke through the 200 day moving average at 925. If it can get above the 930s with conviction it could head toward 1,000 where the long term downtrend from May/Sept 2008 meets today. Goldman's 1,050 call would be in the money. So bear market rally or not, a break here could bring more pain for the bears. We'll see how the market digests the GM bankruptcy and if auto delevering affects the market going forward. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Also watch out for capitulation buying.

E-Mini S&P June Future ESM9 (OptionsXpress)

Fed Funds Rate In Backwardation, Will Fed Raise Rates Soon?

Watching Gold, Treasuries, the USD and the market run got me thinking about the Fed's ZIRP plans going forward.

Investors are dumping 10y-30y Treasuries which is steepening the yield curve. The 2y-10y yield spread broke out last week, Gold/USD is decoupling and commodities and equities have been rallying hard. Is the reflation trade well underway or is it getting ahead of itself. Or is this just a technical short covering massacre? GM is expected to file for Chapter 11 tomorrow and the E-mini S&P overnight future is up 1.5% testing ceiling resistance and the 200 day moving average. $SPY pierced the 200 day moving average on Friday.

So will Bernanke have to put his foot on the break and raise rates 25-50 basis points? We are at 0.25% right now. Here are charts of the June and August Fed Funds futures as well as a look at the futures curve which is in backwardization. May 2009 Fed Funds future = 99.82 and Dec 2009 Fed Funds future = 99.69. Looking at the Fed Funds futures options, premium is still heavily weighted toward calls. The May call/put ratio is 72.98, June call/put ratio 33.70, July call/put ratio 13.75, Aug call/put ratio 8.04, Sept call/put ratio 8.4, Oct call/put ratio 5.69.

Bull sentiment seems to taper off toward the end of October and the Oct future is -0.06 from May. The odds are definitely in favor of higher rates/lower prices going forward, however the question is when to pull the trigger in the pit (1 mos, 3 mos, 6 mos, year??).

Fed Funds June Future (Barchart.com)

Fed Funds Sept Future (Barchart.com)

Fed Fund Futures Backwardization (Barchart.com)