|EUR/USD via FXstreet.com|
July Crude Oil -2.78% at 97.32
June E-mini S&P -1.09% at 1313.25
Gold spot -0.04%% at 1508.72
Silver spot -0.97% at 34.69
US Dollar Index (NYBOT) +0.60% at 76.30
|EUR/USD via FXstreet.com|
|Robert Shiller's Housing Index|
(The Big Picture, 4/13/2011)
|$LNKD (LinkedIn Intraday Chart) - FreeStockCharts.com|
Quarterly Adjusted EBITDA Trend
"We have achieved significant growth as our network has scaled and as we have expanded our product offerings. From 2009 to 2010, net revenue increased $123.0 million, or 102%, net income increased $19.4 million, or 487%, and adjusted EBITDA increased $33.3 million, or 227%. In the three months ended March 31, 2011, net revenue increased $49.2 million, or 110%, net income increased $0.3 million, or 14%, and adjusted EBITDA increased $4.2 million, or 46%, over the three months ended March 31, 2010. See “Adjusted EBITDA” below for a definition of adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss)."
LinkedIn Quarterly Revenue Trend
"Using LinkedIn's current valuation as a comparable metric-- 600 times its 2010 earnings of $15.4 million -- Facebook would be worth around $360 billion in the public markets. The company reportedly earned $600 million in net income"
|Source: LinkedIn Press Center|
|My chart below shows SPX trend|
|LinkedIn Corp. Ownership (SEC)|
"Mountain View, Calif. — May 18, 2011 — LinkedIn Corporation, the world’s largest professional network on the Internet, today announced the pricing of its initial public offering of 7,840,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $45.00 per share. A total of 4,827,804 shares are being offered by LinkedIn Corporation, and a total of 3,012,196 shares are being offered by selling stockholders. In addition, LinkedIn Corporation has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,176,000 shares to cover over-allotments, if any. LinkedIn will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders."
|Cisco Conference (Source: Musion Systems Vimeo)|
"That to some extent speaks to a durational statement, to the extent that you're selling swaps and basically reducing the duration of your portfolio."
"We simply suggest that since the Fed has been purchasing 70% to 75% of all the Treasuries that have been offered over the past year to year and half, that it's a legitimate question of who will buy them and at what yield. We simply think that treasury yields have been artificially repressed not only by QE1 and QE2 but by the policy rate."
"The Federal Reserve of New York has estimated perhaps 50 to 100 basis points of under-yielding, over-priced valuation from these programs in combination."
"We think 10-year treasuries will be higher in yield. Now they're around 3.18%; we suspect still that 4% is a beginning level of attraction going forward."
"If the Fed continues to suggest that unemployment is a priority and inflation is contained, then you can expect Fed funds to stay at twenty-five basis points, and that's a very significant anchor for 2s, 5s and even for 10s. So follow the policy language going forward. Expect QE2 to end and that QE3 probably will take the form of language instead of actual purchases going forward."
|Silver ETF Plunge ($SLV)|
|Steve Cohen - S|A|C|
"Some have argued that since investors are still willing to lend to the Treasury at very low rates, the government's financial future can't really be that bad. "Complete nonsense," Mr. Druckenmiller responds. "It's not a free market. It's not a clean market." The Federal Reserve is doing much of the buying of Treasury bonds lately through its "quantitative easing" (QE) program, he points out. "The market isn't saying anything about the future. It's saying there's a phony buyer of $19 billion of Treasurys a week."
Warming to the topic, he asks, "When do you generally get action from governments? When their bond market blows up." But that isn't happening now, he says, because the Fed is "aiding and abetting" the politicians' "reckless behavior."
"As the guys at Nautilus Capital note, cyclical bull markets within secular bears have tended to average just 26 months, with an average gain of 85%, while cyclical bears within secular bears have averaged 19 months, with steep average losses of -39%."
"We are at a unique time in history. The economy and financial markets have been driven by a variety of reflexive forces resulting in widespread destabilization. However, a fully developed parabolic stock market decline offers strong evidence that the extremes have been reached. Insights from George Soros’ theory of reflexivity, supported by examples from the past, lead us to conclude that the imminent reversal will be breathtaking. As we wrote this, the Dow had just surpassed 7,000 after testing 6,500. Indeed, the reversal might be at hand." That worked out quite well. (Continue reading at Seeking Alpha).
"Hayek argued that economic agents base their decisions not on reality but their interpretation of reality and the two are never the same. That's what I called fallibility. Hayek also recognized that decisions based on imperfect understanding are bound to have unintended consequences. But Hayek and I drew diametrically different inferences from this insight. Hayek used it to extol the virtues of the invisible hand, which was the unintended consequence of economic agents perusing their self interest. I used it to demonstrate the inherent instability of financial markets.
In my theory of reflexivity I assert that the thinking of economic agents serves two functions: on the one hand, they try to understand reality that's the cognitive function. On the other, they try to make an impact on the situation and that's the participating or manipulative function. The two functions connect reality and the participants' perception of reality in opposite directions. As long as the two functions work independently they each produced determinate results. But when they operate simultaneous they interfere with each other by introducing an element of uncertainty into both the participants' understanding and the actual course of events. I call the interplay between the two functions that gives rise to the uncertainty reflexivity.
The two way connection between the cognitive and manipulative functions works as feedback loop; the feedback is either positive or negative. The positive feedback reinforces both the prevailing trend and the prevailing bias and leads to a mispricing of financial assets. Negative feedback corrects the bias. At one extreme lies equilibrium, at the other are the financial bubbles. They occur when the mispricing goes too far and becomes unsustainable and the boom is then followed by a bust. In the real world, positive and negative feedback are intermingled and the two extremes are rarely if ever reached." (read the full transcript)
"With these headwinds, I do not feel the same degree of conﬁdence that I did, which was considerable, that the Fed could carry all before it until October 1 of this year. A third round of quantitative easing would very probably keep the speculative game going. But without a QE3, there seem to be too many unexpected (indeed unexpectable) special factors weighing against risk-taking in these overpriced times. I had recommended taking a little more risk than was justiﬁed by value alone in honor of Year 3, QE2, and the Fed in general. Risk now should be more reﬂective of an investment world that has stocks selling at 40% over fair value (about 920 on the S&P 500) and ﬁxed income, manipulated by the Fed, also badly overpriced."
"The market may still get to, say, 1500 before October, but I doubt it, especially without a QE3, although the chance of going up a little more by October 1 is probably still better than even. And whether it will reach 1500 or not, the environment has simply become too risky to justify prudent investors hanging around, hoping to get lucky. So now is not the time to ﬂoat along with the Fed, but to ﬁght it. Investors should take a hard-nosed value approach, which at GMO means having substantial cash reserves around a base of high quality blue chips and emerging market equities, both of which have semi-respectable real imputed returns of over 4% real on our 7-year forecast. The GMO position has also taken a few more percentage points of equity risk off the table."
"We kept our highest conviction older ideas (including MCO and St. Joe) and our highest conviction newer ideas (including the energy-technology stocks described above)."
"Over the medium- and long-term, however, the story is quite different. If current policy settings are maintained, and under reasonable assumptions about economic growth, the federal budget will be on an unsustainable path in coming years, with the ratio of federal debt held by the public to national income rising at an increasing pace.2 Moreover, as the national debt grows, so will the associated interest payments, which in turn will lead to further increases in projected deficits. "
“It's true that allowing America to default would be irresponsible. But it would be more irresponsible to raise the debt ceiling without simultaneously taking dramatic steps to reduce spending and reform the budget process.
“To increase the debt limit without simultaneously addressing the drivers of our debt -- in defiance of the will of our people -- would be monumentally arrogant and massively irresponsible.
“It would send a signal to investors and entrepreneurs everywhere that America still is not serious about dealing with our spending addiction.
“It would erode confidence in our economy and reduce certainty for small businesses. And this would destroy even more American jobs.
“So let me be as clear as I can be. Without significant spending cuts and reforms to reduce our debt, there will be no debt limit increase. And the cuts should be greater than the accompanying increase in debt authority the president is given.
“We should be talking about cuts of trillions, not just billions.
|Greece 5Y CDS (Bloomberg)|
"Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou lashed out at financial markets late on Monday, accusing them of lack of transparency and corruption.
"Profiteering, CDS, derivatives traded without any transparency are threatening to blow up whole countries," he told an anti-corruption conference." /ouch
|Source: Wikimedia Commons|
"Moody's places Greece's ratings on review for possible downgrade
London, 09 May 2011 -- Moody's Investors Service has today placed Greece's B1 local and foreign currency government bond ratings on review for possible downgrade.
Moody's decision to initiate this review was prompted by:
(1) revisions to fiscal metrics, most notably the significant upward revision of the 2010 general government deficit;
(2) increased uncertainty about the sustainability of Greek sovereign debt in the context of potential delays in the achievement of fiscal consolidation targets; and
(3) concerns about the probability and the implications of a delayed and weaker economic recovery.
Moody's review will focus on the factors that will drive the country's debt dynamics over the next few years.
Moody's says that a multi-notch downgrade is possible if it concludes that there is large risk that Greece's debt metrics are on an unsustainable path. In Moody's view, such conditions would materially increase the risk of debt restructuring over the short to medium term. Under such conditions, euro area policymakers have stated that future loans from the Exchange Stability Mechanism would be extended only if private creditors were to bear some of the losses. If the path of Greek debt-to-GDP were to appear unsustainable, then Greece might itself have an incentive to seek a change in the terms of its debt obligations." [continue reading at Moodys.com]
"Ratings On Greece Lowered To 'B/C' From 'BB-/B' On Rising Rescheduling Risk; Remain On CreditWatch Negative
|Relative Index Value (Source: Clear Capital)|
"We should see relative performance of stocks versus what we call tail assets. In other words, if stocks begin to outperform gold; stocks versus oil; we know investors are starting to believe this."
"It just shows you the Treasury market is a lot more than just about QE, *because I think everyone was thinking Treasuries (yields?) would back up because of QE (*double check this). But, you know what? Maybe a lot of it is discounted. It is really hard to tell what the 10-year is telling us. I would just tell you, I'm worried if the 10-year is at 4.5 to 5.0%; that would really destroy the case for stocks."
"It's been a very tough market. Remember people have been kind of bearish on this; they've been wanting to sell every rally here and it's been hard to embrace this as a secular bull market" (does this mean the Dow won't hit Charles Nenner's target of 5,000 in 2013?)
SPX 1475 2011 Target, 1,250 Low (FreeStockCharts)
|Jim Chanos (Source: CNBC)|
"Well, we have what we think is an unsustainable growth path for china. They are growing on the back of investment, and specifically real estate construction. So the consumer as a percent of China's economy is actually dropping, Maria. Net exports, are also dropping interestingly enough. All of the slack and then some is picked up by construction. Particularly and most concerning, high-rise construction of offices and condos in the tier one, tier two and tier three cities. Fixed asset investment including land, according to the Chinese, is now 70% of their economy. And to put that in perspective, the asian tigers in the mid-90s, that grew so fast and then blew up, had a number about half that. About 30% to 35%. So China has embarked on something almost unprecedented here."
|Source: SEC.gov, UBS transactions pdf|
|XLI near 2007 high (freestockcharts)|
|XLI ISE Put/Call Ratio (ISE)|
|Richard Koo (BloombergTV)|
"When the private sector is deleveraging and government deleverages too, the whole thing collapses. That's what happened during the great depression. We made the same mistake in Japan in 1997 and 2001, and I see Europeans making the same mistake right now. And if the U.S. congress makes a move towards fiscal consolidation, the U.S. will be making the same mistake next year; and I don't want to see that happen."
|SILVER SPOT USD/OZ (source: Kitco.com)|
|GMO Commodity Index (Source: GMO April 2011 Letter)|
"Time to Wake Up: Days of Abundant Resources and Falling Prices Are Over Forever
Summary of the Summary
The world is using up its natural resources at an alarming rate, and this has caused a permanent shift in their value. We all need to adjust our behavior to this new environment. It would help if we did it quickly.
- Until about 1800, our species had no safety margin and lived, like other animals, up to the limit of the food supply, ebbing and ﬂowing in population.
- From about 1800 on the use of hydrocarbons allowed for an explosion in energy use, in food supply, and, through the creation of surpluses, a dramatic increase in wealth and scientiﬁc progress.
- Since 1800, the population has surged from 800 million to 7 billion, on its way to an estimated 8 billion, at minimum.
- The rise in population, the ten-fold increase in wealth in developed countries, and the current explosive growth in developing countries have eaten rapidly into our ﬁnite resources of hydrocarbons and metals, fertilizer, available land, and water.
- Now, despite a massive increase in fertilizer use, the growth in crop yields per acre has declined from 3.5% in the 1960s to 1.2% today. There is little productive new land to bring on and, as people get richer, they eat more grain-intensive meat. Because the population continues to grow at over 1%, there is little safety margin.
- The problems of compounding growth in the face of ﬁnite resources are not easily understood by optimistic, short-term-oriented, and relatively innumerate humans (especially the political variety).
- The fact is that no compound growth is sustainable. If we maintain our desperate focus on growth, we will run out of everything and crash. We must substitute qualitative growth for quantitative growth.
- But Mrs. Market is helping, and right now she is sending us the Mother of all price signals. The prices of all important commodities except oil declined for 100 years until 2002, by an average of 70%. From 2002 until now, this entire decline was erased by a bigger price surge than occurred during World War II.
- Statistically, most commodities are now so far away from their former downward trend that it makes it very probable that the old trend has changed – that there is in fact a Paradigm Shift – perhaps the most important economic event since the Industrial Revolution.
- Climate change is associated with weather instability, but the last year was exceptionally bad. Near term it will surely get less bad.
- Excellent long-term investment opportunities in resources and resource efﬁciency are compromised by the high chance of an improvement in weather next year and by the possibility that China may stumble.
- From now on, price pressure and shortages of resources will be a permanent feature of our lives. This will increasingly slow down the growth rate of the developed and developing world and put a severe burden on poor countries.
- We all need to develop serious resource plans, particularly energy policies. There is little time to waste."
|10y Shanghai Property Index (000006.SS) - Yahoo Finance|
|4y Shanghai Properties Index|
"at this point, China’s monetary-policy makers are too far behind the curve. Inflation is entering crisis territory, as consumer prices for many products and services rise at double-digit rates. Signs of panic have appeared along with hoarding which, when it spreads, could trigger a social crisis."
"To change course, policy tightening must shift away from credit rationing and toward market mechanisms. Moreover, the interest rate must be lifted out of the negative column: It should be raised at least three percentage points to allay public fears. These changes are needed as soon as possible."
|NYSE (Source: Wikimedia)|
'AAA/A-1+' Rating On United States of America Affirmed; Outlook Revised To Negative
Publication date: 18-Apr-2011 09:01:33 EST
- We have affirmed our 'AAA/A-1+' sovereign credit ratings on the United States of America.
- The economy of the U.S. is flexible and highly diversified, the country's effective monetary policies have supported output growth while containing inflationary pressures, and a consistent global preference for the U.S. dollar over all other currencies gives the country unique external liquidity.
- Because the U.S. has, relative to its 'AAA' peers, what we consider to be very large budget deficits and rising government indebtedness and the path to addressing these is not clear to us, we have revised our outlook on the long-term rating to negative from stable.
- We believe there is a material risk that U.S. policymakers might not reach an agreement on how to address medium- and long-term budgetary challenges by 2013; if an agreement is not reached and meaningful implementation is not begun by then, this would in our view render the U.S. fiscal profile meaningfully weaker than that of peer 'AAA' sovereigns.